The Effect Of Different Attachment Types On Marginal Bone Loss In Implant Overdenture Prosthesis: A Retrospective Study
Ulviye Çapkat, Hatice Defne Burduroğlu, Esra Bilgi Özyetim, Süleyman Çağatay Dayan
Türk Dişhekimliği Dergisi
Yıl: 2022 | Cilt: 25 | Sayı: 95 | Sayfa: 28-33

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı implant üstü overdenture protezlerde kullanılan Ball ve Locator ataşmanların marjinal kemik kaybı üzerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya Ball veya Locator ataşmanlı iki implant destekli overdenturelar dahil edildi. İki grupta (n=12) toplam 24 implantın dokuz yıllık takip röntgenleri incelendi. Yükleme sonrası ve dokuz yıllık takip röntgenleri arasındaki kemik kayıpları bir görüntü işleme programı aracılığıyla hesaplandı. Gruplar arasında fark Mann-Whitney U testi ile incelendi, istatiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p=0,226). Marjinal kemik kayıplarının grup içi değerlendirmesinde yükleme ve takip zamanı arasındaki farklara Wilcoxon Signed Ranks testi ile bakıldı ve İstatiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (Ball p=0,182; Locator p=0,327). Bununla birlikte Ball ataşman kullanılan implantlardaki marjinal kemik kaybı ortalamasının (0,237±0,831) Locator ortalamasından (0,093±0,558) fazla olduğu görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Locator, Ball, İmplant, Protez

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of Ball and Locator attachments used in implant supported overdenture prostheses on marginal bone loss. Two implant supported overdentures with Ball or Locator attachments were included in the study. Nine-year follow-up x-rays of a total of 24 implants in two groups (n=12) were analyzed. Bone losses between post-loading and nine-year follow-up x-rays were calculated using an image processing program. The difference between the groups was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test, no statistically significant difference was found (p=0.226). In the within-group evaluation of marginal bone loss, the differences between loading and follow-up time were evaluated with the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and no statistically significant difference was found (Ball p=0.182; Locator p=0.327). However, the mean marginal bone loss in the implants with Ball attachment (0.237±0.831) was higher than the implants with Locator attachment (0.093±0.558).

Keywords

Locator, Ball, Implant, Prosthesis

Referanslar | References

  1. Akça K, Çavuşoğlu Y, Sağırkaya E, Cehreli M C: Early-loaded one-stage implants retaining mandibular overdentures by two different mechanisms: 5-year results. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2013,28(3).
  2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986,1(1):11-25.
  3. Bilhan H, Erdogan O, Geçkili O, Bilgin T: Comparison of Marginal Bone Levels Around Tissue-Level Implants with Platform-Matched and Bone-Level Implants with Platform-Switching Connections: 1-Year Results of a Prospective Cohort Study with a Split-Mouth Design. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2021,36(5).
  4. Boerrigter E, Van Oort R, Raghoebar G, Stegenga B, Schoen P, Boering G: A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures: clinical aspects. Journal of oral rehabilitation 1997,24(3):182-90.
  5. Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Haas R, Watzek G, Mailath G, Pommer B: Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. Journal of periodontal & implant science 2014,44(3):102-8.
  6. Castellanos-Cosano L, Carrasco-García A, Corcuera-Flores J R, Silvestre-Rangil J, Torres-Lagares D, Machuca-Portillo G: An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study. Odontology 2021,109(3):649-60.
  7. Celik G, Uludag B: Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2007,97(4):229-35.
  8. Chikunov I, Doan P, Vahidi F: Implant‐retained partial overdenture with resilient attachments. Journal of Prosthodontics 2008,17(2):141-8.
  9. Chrcanovic B R, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A: A retrospective study on clinical and radiological outcomes of oral implants in patients followed up for a minimum of 20 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018,20(2):199-207.
  10. Cooper L F, Moriarty J D, Guckes A D, Klee L B, Smith R G, Almgren C, Felton D A: Five-year prospective evaluation of mandibular overdentures retained by two microthreaded, TiOblast nonsplinted implants and retentive ball anchors. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2008,23(4).
  11. Çelebioğlu B G, Türkoğlu K, Üçtaşlı S: İki implant destekli mandibuler overdenture uygulamalarının 5 yıllık klinik ve radyografik değerlendirilmeleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi,28(3):151-7.
  12. De Angelis F, Papi P, Mencio F, Rosella D, Di Carlo S, Pompa G: Implant survival and success rates in patients with risk factors: results from a long-term retrospective study with a 10 to 18 years follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017,21(3):433-7.
  13. Donatsky O: Osseointegrated dental implants with ball attachments supporting overdentures in patients with mandibular alveolar ridge atrophy. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1993,8(2).
  14. Ebadian B, Azadbakht K, Shirani M: The Correlation of Clinical Outcomes (Marginal Bone Loss, Probing Depth, and Patient Satisfaction) With Different Prosthetic Aspects of Implant Overdentures: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of oral Implantology 2020,46(3):227-34.
  15. Elsyad M, Elsaih E, Khairallah A: Marginal bone resorption around immediate and delayed loaded implants supporting a locator‐retained mandibular overdenture. A 1‐year randomised controlled trial. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2014,41(8):608-18.
  16. ELsyad M A, Denewar B A, Elsaih E A: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bar, Telescopic, and Locator Attachments for Implant-Stabilized Overdentures in Patients with Mandibular Atrophied Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2018,33(5).
  17. Feine J, Carlsson G, Awad M, Chehade A, Duncan W, Gizani S, Head T, Lund J, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R: The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2002,17(4):601-2.
  18. Feine J S, Carlsson G E: Implant overdentures the standard of care for edentulous patients. New York 2003.
  19. Fukuda C T, Carneiro S R S, Alves V T E, Pustiglioni F E, De Micheli G: Radiographic alveolar bone loss in patients undergoing periodontal maintenance. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College 2008,49(3):99-106.
  20. Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Ortega-Oller I, Monje A, F O V, Catena A: Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: beyond 2 mm. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015,26(4):e28-e34.
  21. Gonçalves F, Campestrini V L L, Rigo-Rodrigues M A, Zanardi P R: Effect of the attachment system on the biomechanical and clinical performance of overdentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2020,123(4):589-94.
  22. Guljé F L, Raghoebar G M, Erkens W A, Meijer H J: Impact of Crown-Implant Ratio of Single Restorations Supported by 6-mm Implants: A Short-Term Case Series Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016,31(3):672-5.
  23. Heckmann S M, Wichmann M G, Winter W, Meyer M, Weber H P: Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture‐bearing area. Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment. Clinical oral implants research 2001,12(6):640-7.
  24. Helmy M H E-D, Elsokkary M, ELsyad M A, Ali R M M: Effect of Attachment Type, Maximum Occlusal Force, and Denture Deformation on Marginal Bone Loss of Two-Implant Overdentures: A Short-Term Clinical Trial. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2022,37(2).
  25. Klein M, Tarnow D, Lehrfield L: Marginal Bone Changes on Ultraclean, Micro-Threaded Platform-Switched Implants Following Restoration: 1- to 4-Year Data. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2020,41(4):e7-e18.
  26. Kullman L, Asfour A A, Zetterqvist L, Andersson L: Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2007,22(1).
  27. Lee S Y, Koak J Y, Kim S K, Rhyu I C, Ku Y, Heo S J, Han C H: A Long-Term Prospective Evaluation of Marginal Bone Level Change Around Different Implant Systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016,31(3):657-64.
  28. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A: The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2009,24(4).
  29. Ma S, Payne A G: Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2010,23(2):117-26.
  30. Ma S, Tawse-Smith A, Thomson W M, Payne A G: Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2010,23(4).
  31. Marinis A, Afshari F S, Yuan J C-C, Lee D J, Syros G, Knoernschild K L, Campbell S D, Sukotjo C: Retrospective analysis of implant overdenture treatment in the advanced prosthodontic clinic at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Journal of oral Implantology 2016,42(1):46-53.
  32. Martin R B, Burr D B, Sharkey N A, Fyhrie D P: Skeletal tissue mechanics: Springer, 1998.
  33. Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Gröndahl H, Hollender L: Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height. Dentomaxillofacial radiology 1991,20(3):155-60.
  34. Natali A N: Dental biomechanics: CRC Press, 2003.
  35. Persson R E, Tzannetou S, Feloutzis A G, Brägger U, Persson G R, Lang N P: Comparison between panoramic and intra‐oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population. Journal of clinical periodontology 2003,30(9):833-9.
  36. Pham N Q, Gonda T, Takahashi T, Maeda Y: The influence of bone loss on peri-implant bending strain under overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019,34(4):900–6.
  37. Ramaglia L, Di Spirito F, Sirignano M, La Rocca M, Esposito U, Sbordone L: A 5-year longitudinal cohort study on crown to implant ratio effect on marginal bone level in single implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019,21(5):916-22.
  38. Sasada Y, Cochran D L: Implant-Abutment Connections: A Review of Biologic Consequences and Peri-implantitis Implications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017,32(6):1296-307.
  39. Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A: Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clinical Oral Investigations 2009,13(4):375-81.
  40. Sheridan R A, Decker A M, Plonka A B, Wang H-L: The role of occlusion in implant therapy: a comprehensive updated review. Implant Dentistry 2016,25(6):829-38.
  41. Tercanli Alkis H, Turker N: Retrospective evaluation of marginal bone loss around implants in a mandibular locator-retained denture using panoramic radiographic images and finite element analysis: A pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019,21(6):1199-205.
  42. Ting M, Tenaglia M S, Jones G H, Suzuki J B: Surgical and patient factors affecting marginal bone levels around dental implants: a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews. Implant Dentistry 2017,26(2):303-15.
  43. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid W, Morris C: Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography: I. General considerations. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis 1981,22(3A):295-9.
  44. Turkyilmaz I: Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants. Journal of clinical periodontology 2006,33(3):233-8.
  45. Tymstra N, Raghoebar G, Vissink A, Meijer H: Maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption in patients wearing a mandibular implant‐retained overdenture. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2011,38(7):509-16.
  46. Van Waas M A: The influence of psychologic factors on patient satisfaction with complete dentures. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1990,63(5):545-8.
  47. Vazquez L, Nizam Al Din Y, Christoph Belser U, Combescure C, Bernard J P: Reliability of the vertical magnification factor on panoramic radiographs: clinical implications for posterior mandibular implants. Clinical oral implants research 2011,22(12):1420-5.
  48. Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest D, Carrel J-P, Belser U C: Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofacial radiology 2013,42(2):20110429.
  49. Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M: Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss. Clinical oral implants research 2010,21(5):466-72.