Yıl: 2022 | Cilt: 25 | Sayı: 95 | Sayfa: 4-8
Özet
Titanyum dental implant abutment yüzeylerine uygulanan farklı yüzey işlemlerinin, yüzey ıslanabilirliğine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Uygulanan yüzey işlemlerine göre 60 adet abutment beş gruba ayrıldı: Grup 1: Kontrol grubu; Grup 2: Kumlama işlemi uygulanan grup; Grup 3: Hidrojen peroksit uygulanan grup; Grup 4: Kimyasal mekanik cilalama işlemi uygulanan grup; Grup 5: Sol-jel yöntemiyle titanyum dioksit nano kaplama işlemi uygulanan grup. Yüzey işlemleri uygulamalarından sonra abutment yüzeylerinin ışık mikroskobu ile analizi ve temas açısı ölçüm cihazı ile temas açısı ölçümleri yapıldı. Verilerin istatistiksel değerlendirilmesinde tek yönlü varyans analizi testi kullanıldı. En yüksek yüzey temas açısı değerleri ortalamaları kumlama işlemi uygulanan grupta belirlendi. Kumlama işlemi uygulanan grubu sırası ile hidrojen peroksit işlemi uygulanan grup, kontrol grubu, kimyasal mekanik cilalama işlemi uygulanan grup ve sol-jel yöntemiyle titanyum dioksit nano kaplama işlemi uygulanan grup izledi.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Titanyum, Kimyasal Mekanik Cilalama, Sol-Jel Yöntemiyle Titanyum Dioksit Nano Kaplama, Temas Açısı, Islanabilirlik.Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments applied to the titanium dental implant abutment surfaces on surface wettability. 60 abutments were divided into five groups (n:12) based on the selected surface treatments; Group 1: Untreated; Group 2: Sandblasted; Group 3: Hydrogen peroxide; Group 4: Chemical mechanical polishing and; Group 5: Sol-gel nano coating with titanium dioxide. After following the surface treatments, light microscope analyses and the contact angle measurements of abutment surface were performed. Data were statistically evaluated with one-way analysis of variance test. Significance was evaluated in p<0.05 level. The highest surface contact angle values were obtained with the sandblasted group followed by the hydrogen peroxide group, the control group, the chemical mechanical polishing group, sol-gel nano coating with titanium dioxide group.
Keywords
Titanium, Chemical Mechanical Polishing, Sol-Gel Nano Coating With Titanium Dioxide, Contact Angle, Wettability.Referanslar | References
1. Ates SM, Korkmaz FM, Caglar IS, Duymus ZY, Turgut S, Bagis EA: The effect of ultrafast fiber laser application on the bond strength of resin cement to titanium. Lasers Med Sci 2017, 32:1121–1129.
2. Baburaj EG, Starikov D, Evans J, Shafeev GA, Bensaoula A: Enhancement of adhesive joint strength by laser surface modification. Int J Adhes Adhes 2007, 27:268–276.
3. Basim GB, Ozdemir Z: Chemical mechanical polishing implementation on dental implants. 2015 International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology. 2016
4. Bieniaś J, Surowska B, Stoch A, Matraszek H, Walczak M: The influence of SiO2 and SiO2-TiO2 intermediate coatings on bond strength of titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 2009, 25:1128–1135.
5. Chaar MS, ATT W, Strub JR: Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011, 38:697–711.
6. Darvell BW, Samman N, Luk WK, Clark RK, Tideman H: Contamination of titanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting. J Dent 1995, 23:319–322.
7. Djaoued Y, Badilescu S, Ashrit P V, Bersani D, Lottici PP, Robichaud J: Study of anatase to rutile phase transition in nanocrystalline titania films. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2002, 24:255–264.
8. Elsaka SE: Effect of surface pretreatments on the bonding strength and durability of self-adhesive resin cements to machined titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2013, 109:113–120.
9. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS. Effect acidic and alkaline heat treatments on the bond strength of different luting cements to commercially pure titanium. J Dent. 2009; 37:255–263.
10. Fonseca RG, de Almeida JGDSP, Haneda IG, Adabo GL: Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals. J Prosthet Dent 2009, 101:262–8.
11. He J, Ichinose I, Fujikawa S, Kunitake T, Nakao A: A General, efficient method of incorporation of metal ions into ultra thin TiO2 films. Chem Mater 2002, 14:3493–3500.
12. Kamijo K, Yoshida T, Mizoguchi T, Nagasawa S, Ito M: Evolution of H2O2 surface treatment for the adhesion between resin cements and titanium. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devices 2002, 21:121–124.
13. Kaufman FB: Chemical-mechanical polishing for fabricating patterned W metal features as chip interconnects. J Electrochem Soc 1991, 138:3460.
14. Kim JT, Cho SA: The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 2009, 101:101–106.
15. Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL: The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006, 95:450–455.
16. Kunt GE, Ceylan G, Yilmaz N: Effect of surface treatments on implant crown retention. J Dent Sci 2010, 5:131–135.
17. Lim B-S, Heo S-M, Lee Y-K, Kim C-W: Shear bond strength between titanium alloys and composite resin: sandblasting versus fluoride-gel treatment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003, 64:38–43.
18. McCracken M: Dental implant materials: commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys. J Prosthodont 1999, 8:40–3.
19. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD: Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:719–728.
20. Miller S, Zernik J: Sandblasting of bands to increase bond strength. J Clin Orth 1996, 30:217–22.
21. Newsome P, Reaney D, Owen S: Screw-versus cement-retained crowns. Irish Dent 2011, 22–25.
22. O’Brien WJ: Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. 2002.
23. Ozdemir Z, Basim GB: Effect of chemical mechanical polishing on surface nature of titanium implants FT-IR and wettability data of titanium implants surface after chemical mechanical polishing implementation. Data Br 2017, 10:20–25.
24. Ozdemir Z, Ozdemir A, Basim GB: Application of chemical mechanical polishing process on titanium based implants. Mater Sci Eng C 2016, 68:383–396.
25. Pan J, Thierry D, Leygraf C: Electrochemical and XPS studies of titanium for biomaterial applications with respect to the effect of hydrogen peroxide. J Biomed Mater Res 1994, 28:113–122.
26. Sahu N, Lakshmi N, Azhagarasan NS, Agnihotri Y, Rajan M, Hariharan R: Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2014, 8:239–242.
27. Seker E, Kilicarslan MA, Deniz ST, Mumcu E, Ozkan P: Effect of atmospheric plasma versus conventional surface treatments on the adhesion capability between self-adhesive resin cement and titanium surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2015, 7:249–256.
28. Shadid R, Sadaqa N: A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review. J Oral Implantol 2012, 38:298–307.
29. Sittig C, Textor M, Spencer ND, Wieland M, Vallotton PH: Surface characterization of implant materials c.p. Ti, Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-6Al-4V with different pretreatments. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999, 10:35–46.
30. Tengvall P, Lundström I, Sjöqvist L, Elwing H, Bjursten LM: Titanium-hydrogen peroxide interaction: model studies of the influence of the inflammatory response on titanium implants. Biomaterials 1989, 10:166–175.
31. Tengvall P, Elwing H, Sjöqvist L, Lundström I, Bjursten LM: Interaction between hydrogen peroxide and titanium: a possible role in the biocompatibility of titanium. Biomaterials 1989, 10:118–120.
32. Velten D, Biehl V, Aubertin F, Valeske B, Possart W, Breme J: Preparation of TiO2 layers on cp-Ti and Ti6Al4V by thermal and anodic oxidation and by sol-gel coating techniques and their characterization. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 59:18–28.
33. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M: Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007, 23:45–50.
34. Yoshida T, Terashima N, Niiro T, Nagasawa S, Ito M, Yagasaki H, Oshida Y, Agarwal P: Bond strength of resin cements to H2O2-treated titanium plates. Dent Mater 2005, 21:1087–1097.