Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bükülebilir dayanağa sahip tek parça kortikobazal dental implantların sağ kalımları ve marjinal kemik kayıplarının değerlendirilmesidir. Bu retrospektif çalışmada, bir yıl önce toplam 100 adet tek parça kortikobazal implant yerleştirilmiş 20 hastaya ait veriler kullanılmıştır. Hastaların implant yerleşiminden hemen sonra ve tam 1 yıl sonra çekilmiş panoramik radyografileri karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Radyografik bulgularda implantların ortalama kemik kaybı 0,22 mm olarak saptanmış, kemik kayıpları ile implant çapı, boyu ve uygulanan çene ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir korelasyon bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Tek parça implantların 1 yıl sonundaki sağ kalım oranı %100 olarak saptanmıştır. Tüm bu bulguların ışığında tek parça kortikobazal implantların 1 yıllık sağ kalım oranları ve düşük kemik kayıpları göz önüne alındığında klinikte başarı ile kullanılabileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tek Parça Dental İmplant, Marjinal Kemik Kaybı, Sağ Kalım, Bükülebilir Dayanak

---

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the survival rates and marginal bone levels of corticobasal one-piece implants. In this retrospective trial, the 1 year data belonging to 100 one-piece corticobasal implants that were inserted to 20 patients were used. The panoramic radiographs of the included patients that were taken at loading time and 1 year after were compared and evaluated. The mean bone loss of implants was 0.22 mm; no correlations were detected between bone loss and implant diameter, length and inserted jaws (p>0.05). The survival rate of one-piece implants were %100 after 1 year. In the light of the present results and taking into the consideration of low marginal bone loss and high survival rates, it can be concluded that one-piece corticobasal single piece implants can be successfully used in the clinic.

Keywords

One-Piece Dental Implant, Marginal Bone Loss, Survival, Bendable Abutment

---

Referanslar | References

1. Abu-Serriah M.M., Mc. Gowan D.A., Moss K.F., Bagg J. : Extraoral Craniofacial Endoosseous İmplants and Radiotheraphy. İnt J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 2003, 32, 585.592.
2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416
3. Ahmad O, Thamer B. Basal screw implantology without sinus lifting. Pak Oral Dent J. 2014;34:414–6.
4. Albrektsson T, Zorb G, Worthington P, Eriksson RA. The long term efficiacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986,1:11-25.
5. Anuradha M, Babaji HV, Hiremath NV, Usha VA, Kumar A, Nandkeoliar T, Verma S. Assessment of basal implants in compromised ridges. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 ,9:2067-70
6. Doornewaard R, Sakani S, Matthys C, Glibert M, Bronkhorst E, Vandeweghe S, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H. Four-implant-supported overdenture treatment in the maxilla. Part I: A randomized controlled split mouth trial assessing the effect of microthreads and abutment connection type on 4 years peri-implant health. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):671-679.
7. Engquist B, Ăstrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Branemark System implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 13, 2002; 30-37.
8. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S ve ark. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002, 17: 601-2.
9. Galindo DF, Butura CC. Immediately loaded mandibular fixed implant prostheses using the all on-four protocol: a report of 183 consecutively treated patients with 1 year of function in definitive prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012 7:628-33.
10. Gupta AD, Verma A, Dubey T, Thakur S. Basal osseointegrated implants:   Classification and review. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017,4:2329-35.
11. Lazarov A. Immediate Functional Loading: Results for the Concept of the Strategic Implant®. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019 ,9:78-88.
12. Ma M, Qi M, Zhang D, Liu H. The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2019 ,45:503-8.
13. Malo P, Nobre M, Lopes A. All on-4 Immediate-Function Concept for Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long term (5 years) outcomes, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14 : 139-50.
14. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-Four Immediate-Function Concept with Brånemark System Implants for Completely Edentulous Mandibles: A Retrospective Clinical Study, Clin Implant Dent R 2003, 5:2-9.
15. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, ve ark. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008;17:5–15.
16. Misch CE: Early crestal bone loss etiology and its effect on treatment planning for implants, Post Grad Dent 2(3): 3-17,1995
17. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, García-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014 ,25:1119-24.
18. Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17: 401-10.
19. Negri M, Galli C, Smerieri A, Macaluso GM, Manfredi E, Ghiacci G, Toffoli A, Bonanini M, Lumetti S. The effect of age, gender, and insertion site on marginal bone loss around endosseous implants: results from a 3-year trial with premium implant system. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:369051. doi: 10.1155/2014/369051.
20. Pałka ŁR, Lazarov A. Immediately Loaded Bicortical Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction and Healed Sites in Patients with and Without a History of Periodontal Disease. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019,9:371-8.
21. Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e474-e488.
22. Tha TP, Ganapathy D, Jain AR. Basal implants - A review. Drug Invention Today. 2018, 10:3430–3.
23. van Kampen FM, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Bosman F. Masticatory function with implant-supported overdentures. J Dent Res, 83: 708-711.
24. Yadav RS, Sangur R, Mahajan T, Rajanikant A. V, Singh N, Singh R. An Alternative to Conventional Dental Implants: Basal Implants. Rama Univ J Dent Sci, 2015;2:22-28.